or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Robert 'Bob' Corker

Senator Robert 'Bob' Corker's Special Interest Group Ratings

Robert 'Bob' Corker
Full Name: Robert 'Bob' Corker
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Republican
First Elected: 11/07/2006
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2018

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 87%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 92%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 75%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 85%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 85%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 81%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 87%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 19%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 79%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 29%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 71%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 21%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 93%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 60%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 60%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 86%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 77%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 21%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 24%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 87%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 74%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 94%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 100%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 88%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 79%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 83%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 90%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 69%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 70%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 66%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 34%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 63%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 86%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 84%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 68%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 70%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 67%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 77.8%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 79%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 75%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 73%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 82%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 100
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Right Wing Index Score 50%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 52%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 83%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 94%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 30%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 75.8%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 91%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 66%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 82%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 64%
2007 Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Action Fund - Positions 50%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 60%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 70%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 66

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

2012 Endorsements

Back to top