Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Michael 'Mike' H. Michaud's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Technology and Communication

Office: U.S. House (ME) - District 2, Democratic

Technology and Communication

2013-2014 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (Interim Mid-Year) 74%
2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 88%
2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 50%
2012 TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry 75%
2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 78%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2008 CNET News - Positions 67%
2007-2008 Information Technology Industry Council - Positions 43%
2007 Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions 71%
2007 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 66%
2007 TechAmerica - Positions 75%
2006 CNET News - Positions 58%
2005-2006 Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions 57%
2005-2006 Information Technology Industry Council - Positions 43%
2005-2006 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 19%
2005 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2004 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2004 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Information Technology Industry Council - Positions 50%
2003-2004 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 38%
2003 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2003 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top