Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Michael 'Mike' H. Michaud's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (ME) - District 2, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for Governor

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 6%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 6%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 10%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 8%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 17%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 28%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 30%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 27%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 12%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 31%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 34%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 20%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 10%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 30
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 12%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 8%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 28%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 16%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 16%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 23%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 4%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 4%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 6%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 11%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 12%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 23%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 5%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 28%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 20%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 20%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 13%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 22%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 23%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 3%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 8%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 26%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 18%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 20%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 20%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 15%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 9%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 9%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 42%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 40%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 27%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 25%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 12
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 22%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 12%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 3%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 31.2%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 40%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 14%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 30.3%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 28%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 21%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 36%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 27%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 28%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 25%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 31%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 30%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 30%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 10%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 50%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 30%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 45%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 40%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 32%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 46%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 19%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 31%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 25%
2002 Christian Civic League of Maine - Positions on Conservative Values 0%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 12%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top