Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kirsten E. Gillibrand's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. Senate (NY) - Jr, Democratic

2012 Endorsements

Animals and Wildlife

2014 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 67%
2013 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 75%
2013 Animal Welfare Institute - Compassion Index 75%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 67%
2013 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 83%
2012 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 86%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 78%
2011-2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 70%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 89%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100%
2008 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 66%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 100
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 81%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 58%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 58
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 90%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 67

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top