Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. Senate (NY) - Jr, Democratic
On The Ballot: Potential, Democratic for President
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Liberal

2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 63% 2013 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90% 2013 National Journal - Liberal (Composite) 86% 2013 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy 82% 2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 73% 2013 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy 71% 2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Composite Score) 85% 2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Foreign) 68% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 69% 2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85% 2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 89% 2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100% 2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 81% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 62% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 77% 2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 56% 2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55% 2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 84% 2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 70% 2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 57% 2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 58.7% 2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.