or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Janice 'Jan' D. Schakowsky

Janice 'Jan' D. Schakowsky's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Senior Citizens

Full Name: Janice 'Jan' D. Schakowsky
Current Office: U.S. House - District 9, Democratic
First Elected: 11/03/1998
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 9
Primary March 18, 2014
General Nov. 4, 2014

Senior Citizens

2014 Alzheimer's Impact Movement - Positions 100%
2013-2014 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 88%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Alzheimer's Impact Movement - Positions 67%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2007-2008 The American Geriatrics Society - Elderly Health Advocacy Score A+
2007 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2006 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2006 The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score 57%
2005-2006 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
2005 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2004 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2004 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Retire Safe - Positions 0%
2003 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2003 Leading Age - Positions 50%
2003 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2002 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2002 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
2002 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 100%
2001 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2001 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 91%
2000 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 100%
2000 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 85%
1999-2000 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
1999-2000 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 91%
1999-2000 United Seniors Association - Positions 30%
1999 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 90%
1999 United Seniors Association - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top