or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Timothy 'Tim' V. Johnson

Timothy 'Tim' V. Johnson's Special Interest Group Ratings

Timothy 'Tim' V. Johnson
Full Name: Timothy 'Tim' V. Johnson

Foreign Affairs

2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 47%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 46%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 54%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 53%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 65%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 70%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 75%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 75%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 83%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 20%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 60%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 46%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 25%
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 20%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 67%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 12%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 11%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 28%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 36%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 40%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 9%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 30%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 7%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 7%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 71%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 38%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 8%
2005 Church World Service - Positions 25
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 23%
2004 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 8%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 43%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 33%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 75%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 40%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 36%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 56%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 78%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -9
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 36%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 13%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top