Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Timothy 'Tim' V. Johnson's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 54%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 67%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 43%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 43%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 66%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 85%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 62%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 66%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 51%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 30%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 68%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 76%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 46%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 95%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 100%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 69%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 79%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 77%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 62%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 80%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2009-2010 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 33
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 41%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 85%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 68%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 78
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 81%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 29%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 63%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 70%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 85%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 100%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 70%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 58.3%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 55%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 94
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 88
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 60%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 87
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 94%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 11%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 57.5%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 50%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 37%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 92
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 86%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 54.2%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 27%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 14%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 52%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 87
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 48%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 49%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 84%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 40%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 25%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 65%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 49%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 56%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 70%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 74%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 69%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top