Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Judy Biggert's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

2012 Endorsements

Women

2012 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 50%
2011-2012 American Association of University Women - Positions 40
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 73%
2011 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 74%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 16%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 75%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 8
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 27%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 73%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 11%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 25%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 40
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 63%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 83
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 40%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 60%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 40%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 41%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 67%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 43%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2004 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 62%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 62%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 10%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 43%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 40%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 43%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 62%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 30%
2002 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women - Positions 45%
2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 27%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 41%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 23%
2001 American Association of University Women - Positions 43%
2001 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 75%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 57%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 73%
1999-2000 American Association of University Women - Positions 50%
1999 American Association of University Women - Positions 66%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top