Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Judy Biggert's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Foreign Affairs

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 38%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 33%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 42%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 8%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 75%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 27%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 8%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 80%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 25%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 13%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 13%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 33%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 33%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 39%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 15%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 0%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 20%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 25%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions +1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 14%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 18%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 30%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 27%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 17%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 40%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 14%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 14%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 63%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 88%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 8%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -7
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 63%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 23%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 57%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 33%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 20%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 87.5%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -6
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 20%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 36%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 80%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 11%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 22%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 44%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 88%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 11%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 83%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 80%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 36%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 100%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 27%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 100%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 39%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 10%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 29%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 29%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 58%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 27%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top