Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Judy Biggert's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Environment

2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 28%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 17%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 13%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 11%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 57%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 17%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 57%
2011 Environment America - Positions 15%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 17%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 30%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 8
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 33%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 43%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 75
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2009 Environment America - Positions 27%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29%
2008 Environment America - Positions 46%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 52
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 53%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 49%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 53
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 55%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 33%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 75%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 22%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 36%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 68%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 50
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 22%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 20%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 18%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 23%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 43%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 25%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 13%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 25%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 38%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 27%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 23%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 33%
1999-2000 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 87%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 31%
1996 Illinois Environmental Council - Positions 78%
1993 Illinois Environmental Council - Positions 63%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top