Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Judy Biggert's Ratings and Endorsements

2012 Endorsements

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 68%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 68%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 58%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 51%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 57%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 49%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 79%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 67%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 73%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 47%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 68%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 44%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 74%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 46%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 25%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 54%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 53%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 60%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 53%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 71%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 71%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 44%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 63%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 80%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 95%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 75%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 73%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 70%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 68%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 63%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 70%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 72%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 75
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 81%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 62%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 60%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 70%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 50%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64.2%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 41%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 58
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 52
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 41%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 53
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 52%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 59.8%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 32%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 55.8%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 72%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 50
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 40%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 51%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 57%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 53%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 48%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 13%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 20%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 47%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 59%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 62%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 38%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 58%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 65%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 93%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 42%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 41%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 57%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 43%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 58%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 73%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 41%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top