Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Shane Elizabeth Pendergrass's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (MD) - District 13, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for State House - District 13
Vanessa Atterbeary
(Running)
Democratic
Danny Eaton
(Running)
Republican
Frank Turner
(Running)
Democratic
Jimmy Williams
(Running)
Republican
Chris Yates
(Running)
Republican

Business and Consumers

2014 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 30%
2014 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Positions 30%
2013 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 29%
2013 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Positions 30%
2013 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Committee Score 100%
2013 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 86%
2013 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 93%
2012 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 18%
2012 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 100%
2012 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 100%
2011 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 8%
2011 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 100%
2011 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 100%
2010 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 38%
2010 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Score 38%
2010 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - House of Delegates Score 100%
2009 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 20%
2009 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 50%
2008 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 67%
2008 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 0%
2007-2010 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 29%
2007-2009 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Cumulative Score 33%
2007 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 25
2007 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 50%
2006 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 27%
2005-2006 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 25%
2005 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 30%
2004 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 20%
2003 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 0%
2002 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 33%
2001 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 67%
1998-2002 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 45%
1995-1998 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 44%

Environment

2013 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 93
2013 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2012 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2012 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 94%
2011 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2011 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 94%
2010 Environment Maryland - Lifetime Score 93%
2010 Environment Maryland - Positions 86%
2009 Environment Maryland - Lifetime Score 94%
2009 Environment Maryland - Positions 100%
2009 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 94%
2009 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2009 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Committee Score 100%
2008 Environment Maryland - Positions on Environmental Conservation 90
2008 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 90
2007 Environment Maryland - Positions on Environmental Conservation 88
2007 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88
2006 Environment Maryland - Positions 92%
2005-2006 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
2003-2004 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 86%
1999-2000 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%

Technology and Communication

2009-2011 Maryland Drivers Alliance - Positions 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top