or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Christopher 'Chris' Van Hollen, Jr.

Christopher 'Chris' Van Hollen, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Government Operations

Full Name: Christopher 'Chris' Van Hollen, Jr.
Current Office: U.S. House - District 8, Democratic
First Elected: 11/05/2002
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 8
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 24, 2014

Government Operations

2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2013 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 16%
2013 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 16%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 24%
2013 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 9%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 15%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 15%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 94%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 95%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 13%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 13%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 11%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 14%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 14%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 12%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 2%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 2%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 0%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 94%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 0%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 2%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 2%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 7%
2009 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 4%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2008 Americans for Fair Taxation - Positions on the FairTax 0
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 6%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 10%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 6%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 10%
2008 FreedomWorks - Positions 0%
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score F
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score F
2008 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 4%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 15%
2007 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 3%
2007 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 3%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 10%
2007 National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions 66%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score F
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score F
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 19%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 36%
2007 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions on Poverty Action A+
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 94%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2006 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2006 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 100%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 9%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 17%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 14%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 14%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 12%
2006 The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score 64%
2005-2006 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 12%
2005-2006 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 12%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 6%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100%
2005 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2005 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 100%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 12%
2005 Church World Service - Positions 100
2005 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 12%
2005 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 12%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 12%
2005 National Criminal Justice Association - Positions 66%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 14%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 14%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 25%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 40%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 55%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 88%
2005 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100%
2004 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 20%
2004 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 15%
2004 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 15%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 11%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 11%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 25%
2004 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 75%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 18%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 3%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 5%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 11%
2003 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 11%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 22%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 22%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 45
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 45
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 45
2003 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2003 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 60%
2002 Maryland Public Interest Research Group - Positions 89%
1995-2004 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top