Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Thomas 'Mike' V. Miller, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (MD) - District 27, Democratic President
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for State Senate - District 27

Business and Consumers

2014 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 25%
2014 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Positions 55%
2013 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 40%
2013 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Positions 56%
2013 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 86%
2013 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 86%
2012 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 25%
2012 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 100%
2012 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 100%
2011 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 11%
2011 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 100%
2011 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 100%
2010 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2010 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Score 59%
2010 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - House of Delegates Score 100%
2010 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - State Senate Score 100%
2009 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 15%
2009 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 33%
2008 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 43%
2008 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 0%
2007-2010 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 25%
2007-2009 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Cumulative Score 11%
2007 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 38
2007 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 0%
2006 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 43%
2005 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2004 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 62%
2003-2004 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 30%
2003 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2002 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2001 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 67%
1998-2002 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 60%
1995-1998 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 71%

Environment

2013 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 70
2013 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2012 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71%
2012 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2011 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2011 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71%
2010 Environment Maryland - Lifetime Score 71%
2010 Environment Maryland - Positions 60%
2009 Environment Maryland - Lifetime Score 72%
2009 Environment Maryland - Positions 83%
2009 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 72%
2009 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83%
2008 Environment Maryland - Positions on Environmental Conservation 89
2008 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 89
2007 Environment Maryland - Positions on Environmental Conservation 83
2007 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83
2006 Environment Maryland - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 92%
2001-2002 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 70%
1999-2000 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 63%
1997-1998 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
1995-1996 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
1991-1994 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%

Technology and Communication

2009-2011 Maryland Drivers Alliance - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top