Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

James 'Jim' H. Webb, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

On The Ballot: Announced, Democratic for President

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 17%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 32%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 14%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 40%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Composite Score) 37%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 22%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 21%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 24%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 18%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 21%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 10%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 19%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 14%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 11%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 35%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 21%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 13%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 14%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 42%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 15%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 6%
2009-2010 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 18%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 9
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 75%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 10%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 10%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 10%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 15%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 17%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 6%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 52%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 10%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 12%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 38%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 36.2%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 10
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 20%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 15%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 25%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 16%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 39.8%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 47%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top