or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Patrick J. Murphy

Patrick J. Murphy's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Patrick J. Murphy

Foreign Affairs

2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 38%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 38%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 60%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 66%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 66%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 36%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 39%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 8%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 50%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 70%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score C
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 17%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 75%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 77%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement D
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 78%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 73%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 64%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 83%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 25%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top