Representative Jared William Huffman's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. House (CA) - District 2, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 2
View 2014 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores 36% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Other) 100% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Labor) 0% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Infrastructure) 75% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Environment) 0% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 36% 2013-2014 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100% 2013-2014 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 12% 2013-2014 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (Interim Mid-Year) 68% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor 50% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Healthcare (House Only) 0% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Budget/Tax 0% 2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 30 2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 20 2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 76% 2013 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0% 2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 0% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 31% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 31% 2012 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 42% 2012 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 25% 2012 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 64% 2012 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 100% 2012 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Issues 100% 2011 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 14% 2011 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 18% 2011 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 40% 2011 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 100% 2011 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 100% 2010 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 35% 2010 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 18% 2010 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 100% 2009 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 15% 2009 California National Federation of Independent Business - State Assembly Score 11% 2009 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100% 2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 100% 2008 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 13% 2008 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 9 2007-2008 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 13% 2007 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 7 2007 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 0 2007 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 93 2007 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 100% 2005-2010 Consumer Federation of California - Cumulative Score 100% 2005-2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 100%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured June 17, 2014) 92% 2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured January 3, 2014) 90% 2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67% 2014 Hispanic Federation, LCLAA, LULAC, Mi Familia Vota, NCLR, and Voto Latino - National Immigration Scorecard 100% 2014 Human Rights Campaign - Positions on Marriage 100% 2014 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100% 2014 National Council of La Raza - Positions (Preliminary) 100% 2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 79% 2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100% 2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 99 2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 21% 2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 13% 2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 29% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 97% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 95% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 100% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 98% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 95% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 97% 2009 Applied Research Center - Leadership Score 0% 2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Housing and Economics Score 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Overall Score 86% 2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Civil Rights 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Education Equity 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Criminal Justice 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Legal Racism Score 0% 2009 Applied Research Center - Health Equity Score 100% 2008 Equality California - Positions 100% 2007 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 90 2007 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 100 2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100 2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 100 2007 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100 2007 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100 2007 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 100 2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100

Environment

2014 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 100% 2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 83% 2013 Environment America - Positions 100% 2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 100% 2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 100% 2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100% 2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 99% 2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100% 2012 Clean Water Action California - Positions 100% 2011-2012 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 100% 2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 99% 2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 94% 2011 Sierra Club California - Positions 92% 2010 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 100% 2010 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100% 2010 Sierra Club California - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Clean Water Action California - Positions 90% 2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 100% 2009 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100% 2009 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 100% 2009 Environment California - Positions 100% 2009 Sierra Club California - Positions 87% 2008 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100 2008 Sierra Club California - Positions 100% 2007-2008 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 90% 2007 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100 2007 Sierra Club California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.