Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jared William Huffman's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Labor Unions

Office: U.S. House (CA) - District 2, Democratic

Labor Unions

2014 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2013-2014 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions (House) 100%
2013-2014 Workplace Choice - Positions 0
2013 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 95%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 95%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 95%
2013 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2013 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 100%
2013 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 85%
2013 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0%
2012 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Total Score 90%
2012 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Commitee Score 50%
2012 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Floor Score 96%
2012 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Floor Score 90%
2012 California School Employees Association - Positions on Classified School Employee Issues 90%
2011 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Floor Score 97%
2009 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 99
2009 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Committee Votes Score 100
2009 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2009 California School Employees Association - Positions 70%
2008 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2007 California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 97

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top