Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jared William Huffman's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (CA) - District 2, Democratic

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 83%
2013 Environment America - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 100%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 99%
2012 Clean Water Action California - Positions 100%
2011-2012 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 100%
2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 99%
2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 94%
2011 Sierra Club California - Positions 92%
2010 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2010 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 100%
2010 Sierra Club California - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Clean Water Action California - Positions 90%
2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 100%
2009 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2009 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 Environment California - Positions 100%
2009 Sierra Club California - Positions 87%
2008 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100
2008 Sierra Club California - Positions 100%
2007-2008 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 90%
2007 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100
2007 Sierra Club California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top