or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Jared William Huffman

Jared William Huffman's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Full Name: Jared William Huffman
Current Office: U.S. House - District 2, Democratic
First Elected: 11/06/2012
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 2
Primary June 3, 2014
General Nov. 4, 2014

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured June 17, 2014) 92%
2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured January 3, 2014) 90%
2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2014 Hispanic Federation, LCLAA, LULAC, Mi Familia Vota, NCLR, and Voto Latino - National Immigration Scorecard 100%
2014 Human Rights Campaign - Positions on Marriage 100%
2014 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 79%
2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 99
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 21%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 13%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 29%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 98%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 95%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 97%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 95%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 97%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Housing and Economics Score 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Civil Rights 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Education Equity 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Overall Score 86%
2009 Applied Research Center - Legal Racism Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Health Equity Score 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Criminal Justice 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Leadership Score 0%
2008 Equality California - Positions 100%
2007 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 90
2007 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 100
2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100
2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 100
2007 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 100
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top