Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jared Huffman's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Office: U.S. House (CA) - District 2, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 2

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2015 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 100%
2015 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2015 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 94%
2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2014 Hispanic Federation, LCLAA, LULAC, Mi Familia Vota, NCLR, and Voto Latino - National Immigration Scorecard 100%
2014 Human Rights Campaign - Positions on Marriage 100%
2014 Liberty for All - Positions 56%
2014 Liberty Guard - Positions 25%
2014 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
2014 National Council of La Raza - Positions (Preliminary) 100%
2014 Stand Against Spying - Positions 100%
2013-2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 88%
2013-2014 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2013 EarthRights International - Positions 63%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 79%
2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2013 Republican Liberty Caucus - Personal Liberties 68%
2013 Venn Institute - Scorecard for International Religious Freedom 17%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 99
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 13%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 29%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 21%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 98%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 97%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 100%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 95%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 95%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 97%
2009 Race Forward - Positions on Civil Rights 100%
2009 Race Forward - Leadership Score 50%
2009 Race Forward - Legal Racism Score 0%
2009 Race Forward - Green Equity Score 100%
2009 Race Forward - Positions on Education Equity 100%
2009 Race Forward - Health Equity Score 100%
2009 Race Forward - Overall Score 86%
2009 Race Forward - Positions on Criminal Justice 100%
2009 Race Forward - Housing and Economics Score 100%
2008 Equality California - Positions 100%
2007 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 100
2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI Rights Score 100%
2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100%
2007 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 100
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100
2007 Race Forward - Positions on Racial Justice 90

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top