Representative Suzanne Bonamici's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. House (OR) - District 1, Democratic, Independent
View 2014 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Environment) 0% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Taxes) 100% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Labor) 0% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 36% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores 47% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Infrastructure) 71% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Other) 100% 2013-2014 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100% 2013-2014 Metals Service Center Institute - Positions 16 2013-2014 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 12% 2013-2014 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (Interim Mid-Year) 70% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor 50% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Budget/Tax 0% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Healthcare (House Only) 0% 2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 30 2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 20 2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 79% 2013 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0% 2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 0% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 31% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 35% 2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions of 112th Congress 15% 2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 80% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 27% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 36% 2011-2012 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 67 2011-2012 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions (House) 0% 2011-2012 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 0 2011-2012 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0% 2011-2012 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 33% 2011-2012 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 67% 2011-2012 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 13% 2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 0% 2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 0% 2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Oregon National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 17%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured January 3, 2014) 90% 2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured June 17, 2014) 92% 2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67% 2014 Hispanic Federation, LCLAA, LULAC, Mi Familia Vota, NCLR, and Voto Latino - National Immigration Scorecard 100% 2014 Human Rights Campaign - Positions on Marriage 100% 2014 Liberty for All - Positions 49% 2014 Liberty Guard - Positions 25% 2014 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 93% 2014 National Council of La Raza - Positions (Preliminary) 100% 2014 Stand Against Spying - Positions 100% 2013-2014 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100% 2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71% 2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100% 2013 Venn Institute - Scorecard for International Religious Freedom 17% 2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100% 2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 73% 2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Total Score 60% 2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil Rights 100% 2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 30% 2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon - Positions 50% 2011-2012 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100% 2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56% 2011 American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon - Positions 50% 2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon - Positions 100% 2009 American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon - Positions 100% 2008 American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon - Positions on Civil Rights Issues 100 2007 American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon - Positions on Civil Rights Issues 88

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 8% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 11% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 10% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 12% 2014 Conservative Review - Positions 12 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 12% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 35% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 29% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013-2014 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 9 2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 30% 2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 6% 2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 12% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 19% 2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 10% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 6% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 20% 2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 35 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 0% 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 0% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 19% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 8% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 18% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 24% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 14% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 7% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 15%

Immigration

2014 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 0% 2014 Hispanic Federation, LCLAA, LULAC, Mi Familia Vota, NCLR, and Voto Latino - National Immigration Scorecard 100% 2014 National Council of La Raza - Positions (Preliminary) 100% 2014 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Overall Score (Jan. 7, 2014) 43% 2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions on Immigration Reform 100% 2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions on Economic Empowerment 100% 2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 100% 2013-2014 National Iranian American Council - Positions 50% 2013 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 100% 2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 9% 2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Legislation Evaluation (House Only) 0% 2011-2012 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 7% 2011-2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 5% 2009-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards (Feb 11, 2013) 0% 2009-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Overall (Feb 11, 2013) 0% 2009-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Reduce Unnecessary Foreign Workers (Feb 11, 2013) 0% 2009-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Reduce Amnesty Enticements (Feb 11, 2013) 0% 1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Anchor Baby Citizenship - Career (Feb 11, 2013) % 1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards - Career (Feb 11, 2013) % 1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Immigration at the Border - Career (Feb 11, 2013) % 1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Overall - Career (Feb 11, 2013) 0% 1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Jobs and Presence - Career (Feb 11, 2013) % 1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Chain Migration - Career (Feb 11, 2013) % 1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Visa Lottery - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %

Socially Conservative

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 12% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 12% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 35% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 35% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 29% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 29% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 0% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 0% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 20% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 20% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 19% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 19% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 24% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 24% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 15% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 15% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%

Socially Liberal

2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 67% 2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 67% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 96% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 91% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 96% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 96% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 96% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 91% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 93% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 93% 2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 93% 2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 93% 2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 2% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 2% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 14% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 14% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 56% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 56%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.