or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Richard 'Rick' Ray Larsen

Richard 'Rick' Ray Larsen's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Full Name: Richard 'Rick' Ray Larsen
Current Office: U.S. House - District 2, Democratic
First Elected: 11/07/2000
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 2
Primary Aug. 5, 2014

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured June 17, 2014) 71%
2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured January 3, 2014) 60%
2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2014 Human Rights Campaign - Positions on Marriage 100%
2014 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 93%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 79%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 60%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Total Score 100%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil Rights 100%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 84%
2011-2012 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 90%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 63%
2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 80%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 68%
2011 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) 95%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 88%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 94%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 62%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 38%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 94%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 93%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 10%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 92%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 90
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 85%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 100
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 93%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2007-2008 The Arc - Positions 57%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 100
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 90
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 93%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 100%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 88%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100
2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 100%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur A
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 57%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 96%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 91%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 50%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 92%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 86%
2005-2006 The Arc - Positions 100%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 38%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 91%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 66%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 71%
2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 80%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 88%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 89%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 83%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 67%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 78%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 85%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 87%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 83%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 67%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 83%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 88%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 88%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 73%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 79%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top