Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kirk Pearson's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (WA) - District 39, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for State Senate - District 39

Business and Consumers

2015 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 90%
2015 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 30%
2015 Association of Washington Business - Positions 80%
2014 Associated General Contractors of Washington - Positions 96%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Positions 100%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 11%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 91%
2013-2014 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 90%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 15%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Positions 95%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 90%
2012 Association of Washington Business - Positions 88%
2011-2012 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011 Association of Washington Business - Positions 82%
2010 Association of Washington Business - Positions 93%
2010 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 91%
2009-2010 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2009 Association of Washington Business - Positions 84%
2008 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 88
2007-2008 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 92
2007 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 88
2007 Building Industry Association of Washington - Housing Industry Advocacy Score 100
2007 JobMakers - Job Creation Score 68%
2006 Association of Washington Business - Positions 87%
2006 JobMakers - Job Creation Score 50%
2005-2006 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2005 Association of Washington Business - Positions 100%
2005 Building Industry Association of Washington - Positions 100%
2004 Association of Washington Business - Positions 93%
2003-2004 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2003 Association of Washington Business - Positions 94%
2002 Association of Washington Business - Positions 88%
2001-2002 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 75%

Labor Unions

2016 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 16%
2016 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 22%
2015 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 16%
2015 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 30%
2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 11%
2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 15%
2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 8%
2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 15%
2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 16%
2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 7%
2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Postions 20%
2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 17%
2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 16%
2009 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 25%
2008 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 10
2007 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 0
2006 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 50%
2006 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 42%
2005 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 29%
2005 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
2004 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 17%
2003-2004 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 35%
2003 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 30%
2003 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 10%
2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 30%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top