Senator Michael 'Mike' B. Enzi's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. Senate (WY) - Sr, Republican
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 78% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 88% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 88% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 81% 2014 Conservative Review - Positions 76 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 76% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 71% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 90% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2013-2014 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 100 2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 80% 2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 92% 2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 88% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 96% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 93% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 95% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 80% 2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 90 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 93% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 92% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 85% 2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Composite Score) 88% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 71% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 80% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 87% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 86% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 94% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 77% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 89% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 93% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 90% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 94% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 70% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 70% 2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 96% 2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 93% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 86% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 100% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 92% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 86% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 90% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 89% 2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 100% 2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 93% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 40 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 95% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 80% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 85% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 85% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 90% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 80% 2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 96% 2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84% 2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 93.2% 2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 65% 2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 94% 2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 100 2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 29 2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 65% 2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 96% 2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 83% 2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 14 2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2007 GOPUSA - Positions 27% 2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84% 2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 90.8% 2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 80% 2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 96% 2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 71% 2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 0 2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 76% 2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 89.5% 2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 55% 2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 96% 2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 0 2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 94% 2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 50% 2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 79% 2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 96% 2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 96% 2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67% 2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 90% 2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 80% 2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 93% 2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68% 2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 77% 2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 100% 2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 80% 2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67% 2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 83% 2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 75% 2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 93% 2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93% 2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86% 2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72% 2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 89% 2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86% 2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86% 2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 82% 1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 83% 1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 84% 1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 85% 1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 52% 1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 58% 1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100% 1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 88% 1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 68%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.