Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Hillary Rodham Clinton's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Animals and Wildlife

2010 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2008 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 83%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 83
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 75
2006 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 82%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100+
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 100%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 100%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 100%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2004 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 100%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 100%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 100%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 100%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 100%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 90%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 86%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 86%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 60%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 86%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 86%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 86%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top