or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Hillary Rodham Clinton's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Education

Full Name: Hillary Rodham Clinton

Education

2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2008 American Library Association - Positions 25%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 60%
2007-2008 National Association for College Admission Counseling - Positions 100%
2007-2008 National Education Association - Positions on Public Education Teaching Profession Issues A
2007-2008 National Education Association - Positions on Public Education Teaching Profession Issues A
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 66
2007 American Library Association - Positions 25%
2007 Association For Supervision and Curriculum Development - Positions 100%
2007 National Association for College Admission Counseling - Positions 100%
2007 National Education Association - Positions on Public Education Teaching Profession Issues A
2007 National Education Association - Positions on Public Education Teaching Profession Issues A
2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 100%
2007 Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) - Positions 100%
2006 National Association for College Admission Counseling - Positions 100%
2006 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2005 National Association for College Admission Counseling - Positions 83%
2005 National Association of Elementary School Principals - Positions 0%
2005 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2003-2004 National Education Association - Positions 85%
2003-2004 National Education Association - Positions 85%
2003-2004 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 93%
2003-2004 National School Boards Association - Positions 67%
2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2003 National Education Association - Positions 82%
2003 National Education Association - Positions 82%
2003 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2002 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2002 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2002 National School Boards Association - Positions 100%
2002 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 90%
2001 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2001 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2001 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2001 Population Connection - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top