Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Hillary Rodham Clinton's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 11%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 17.8%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 18%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 8%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 10%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 18%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 8%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 6%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 4%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 17.2%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 10%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 11%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 29.8%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 35%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 21%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 4%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 11%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 15%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 29%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 20%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 8%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 20%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 33%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 5%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 10%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 5%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 13%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 14%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 11%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 10%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 27%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 13%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 27%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 5%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top