Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Douglas 'Doug' Earl Berger's Ratings and Endorsements

Environment

2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 84%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 58%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Positions 80%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 88%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 83%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 58%
2010 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 89%
2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
2009-2010 Environment North Carolina - Positions 78%
2009-2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 84%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Positions 83%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 92%
2009 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 80%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 94%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Positions 90%
2007-2008 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 77%
2007 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100
2007 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 67
2006 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 89
2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2005-2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2005 Environment North Carolina - Positions 100%
2005 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top