Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jim T. Davnie's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (MN) - 63A, Democratic/Farmer/Labor
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic/Farmer/Labor for State House - 63A

Labor Unions

2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 97%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 68%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 100%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 96%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 94%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 100%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94
2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 92
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 80
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 94
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2004 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2001 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce--Labor Policy Votes - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top