Senator Jerry Moran's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. Senate (KS) - Jr, Republican
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured June 17, 2014) 18% 2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured January 3, 2014) 18% 2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0% 2014 Human Rights Campaign - Positions on Marriage 0% 2014 Liberty Guard - Positions 75% 2014 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 21% 2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0% 2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 5% 2013 Venn Institute - Scorecard for International Religious Freedom 50% 2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15% 2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 14% 2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67% 2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Total Score 0% 2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil Rights 0% 2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 25% 2011-2012 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 31% 2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10% 2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 11% 2011 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) 0% 2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5% 2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 13% 2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 12% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 23% 2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 6% 2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 20% 2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -11% 2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 62% 2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 28% 2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5% 2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15% 2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 33 2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 36% 2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 9 2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 38% 2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 31% 2007-2008 The Arc - Positions 14% 2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4 2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 17 2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30% 2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 50 2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 27% 2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 0% 2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 44% 2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0 2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 0% 2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2 2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B+ 2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86% 2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5% 2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 26% 2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C 2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 27% 2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 0% 2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 47% 2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 10% 2005-2006 The Arc - Positions 33% 2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6 2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15% 2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0% 2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 11% 2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 39% 2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0% 2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 29% 2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10% 2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100% 2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0% 2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 50% 2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 10% 2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 21% 2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 22% 2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 43% 2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2 2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25% 2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 50% 2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 33% 2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 40% 2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0 2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 27% 2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 17% 2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 28% 2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 39% 2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 12% 2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 22% 2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 18% 2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 36% 2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 36% 2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 20% 1999-2000 Common Cause - Lifetime Score 0% 1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 19% 1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 38% 1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 9% 1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 36% 1998 National Organization for Women - Positions 10% 1997-1998 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 19% 1997-1998 Campaign for a Color Blind America - Positions 50% 1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 100% 1997-1998 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 1997-1998 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 24% 1997-1998 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 21% 1997 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.