Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Connie Mack IV's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Foreign Affairs

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 54%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 13%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 14%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 12%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 17%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 38%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 63%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 13%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 17%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 25%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 23%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D-
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 29%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 25%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 25%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 16%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 16%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -8%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 8%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 0%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues F
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 22%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D-
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D+
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 14%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 9%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 9%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 17%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 7%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 7%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 82%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 19%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 8%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 13%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 23%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 71%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top