Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Connie Mack IV's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Business and Consumers

Business and Consumers

2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions of 112th Congress 97%
2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 55%
2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 81%
2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 71%
2011-2012 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 67
2011-2012 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions (House) 50%
2011-2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 96%
2011-2012 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: International Trade 100%
2011-2012 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 90%
2011-2012 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 94%
2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 100%
2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 100%
2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 87%
2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 50%
2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75%
2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 62%
2009-2010 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions 100%
2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 73%
2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 0%
2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 72%
2009-2010 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 71%
2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 75%
2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 44%
2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 95%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 82%
2009 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 73%
2008 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 100%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 85%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 88%
2007-2008 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 67%
2007-2008 American Forest and Paper Association - Forest Products Advocacy Score 83%
2007-2008 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 85%
2007-2008 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100%
2007-2008 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 79%
2007-2008 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100
2007-2008 National Restaurant Association - Positions on Restaurant Advocacy 50
2007-2008 National Retail Federation - Positions Retail Industry Advocacy 60%
2007-2008 National Small Business Association - Positions 55%
2007-2008 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 87%
2007-2008 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 40%
2007 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 92%
2007 TechAmerica - Positions 25%
2007 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2007 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 79%
2006 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 75%
2006 Consumer Action - Positions 0%
2006 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 88%
2006 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 18%
2006 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 93%
2006 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 18%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 80%
2005-2006 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 87%
2005-2006 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 69%
2005-2006 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Restaurant Association - Positions 80%
2005-2006 National Retail Federation - Positions 50%
2005-2006 National Small Business Association - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 80%
2005-2006 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions on Population Stabilization 18%
2005 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 85%
2005 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 87%
2005 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2005 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 96%
2005 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 81%
2001-2002 Florida National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 90%
2001 Associated Industries of Florida - Positions 91%
1999-2006 National Ready Mixed Concrete Association - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top