or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mark R. Warner

Senator Mark R. Warner's Special Interest Group Ratings

Mark R. Warner
Full Name: Mark R. Warner
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/04/2008
Next Election: 2014

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 13%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 13%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 10%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 5%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 12%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 7%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 70%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 31%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 61%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 48%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 39%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 16%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 22%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 21%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 21%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 16%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 14%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 43%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 53%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 54%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 51%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 46%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 49%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 10%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 12%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 8%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 24%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 9%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 15%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 22%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 50%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 13%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 10%

Employment and Affirmative Action

2009 Women Employed - Positions 100%

Labor Unions

2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2011 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 81%
2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 83%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0%
2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 93%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 94%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 83%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 85%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 84%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 85%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 89%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 20%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 80%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 80%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 100%
2007 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 40%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top