or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Herbert 'Herb' H. Kohl

Herbert 'Herb' H. Kohl's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Herbert 'Herb' H. Kohl

Foreign Affairs

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 6%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 46%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 75%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 92%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 37%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 44%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 8%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 75%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 29%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 91%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 50%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 10%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 79%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 79%
2009-2012 Council for a Livable World - Positions (Senate) 92%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 60%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 80%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 25%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 75%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 94%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 80%
2008 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 100%
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 80%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement C
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 95%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 82%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights +1
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 75%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 29%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 56%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 56%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 67%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 92%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 5%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 78%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 88%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 19%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 33%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 75%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 89%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 90%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 95%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 30%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 20%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 94%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 75%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 50%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 92%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 14%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 43%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0%
2000 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 88%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 91%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 55%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 88%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 71%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
1999 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 24%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 61%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 35%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 67%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 80%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 91%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 5%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 58%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 80%
1997 Bread for the World - Positions 40%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 7%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 64%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 67%
1996 Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger 57%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 21%
1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 91%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 14%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 84%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 73%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 92%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 83%
1993-1994 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
1990-1999 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top