or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Russell 'Russ' D. Feingold

Russell 'Russ' D. Feingold's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Full Name: Russell 'Russ' D. Feingold

Women

2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 40%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 19%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 100%
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 6%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 60
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 100
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 90%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 80%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 91%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 80%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 75%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 75%
2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 66%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 88%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 77%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 90%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 94%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 93%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women - Positions 88%
2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 89%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 38%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 89%
2001 American Association of University Women - Positions 83%
2001 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 29%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
1999-2000 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1999 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
1998 National Organization for Women - Positions 75%
1997-1998 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
1997 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 94%
1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
1995-1996 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
1995 The Woman Activist - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

2010 Endorsements

Back to top