Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Russell 'Russ' D. Feingold's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Foreign Affairs

2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 10%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 93%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 93%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 67%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 90%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues A+
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 100%
2008 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 67%
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights +2
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement F
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 95%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 100%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights +2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur A+
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 75%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 33%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 67%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 89%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 89%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur A
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 33%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 91%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 91%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 100%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 5%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 78%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 88%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 81%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 57%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 89%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 100%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 80%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 25%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 92%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 54%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 0%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 0%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 86%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 88%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 0%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 100%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 88%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 86%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 42%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 45%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 84%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 25%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 87%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 73%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 21%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 67%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 90%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 14%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 93%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 92%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 14%
1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 91%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 89%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 7%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 91%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 100%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 92%
1993-1994 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top