Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Russell 'Russ' D. Feingold's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 13%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 34%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 20%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 23%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 5%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 19%
2009-2010 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 18%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 91%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 5
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 37%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 33%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 40%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 13%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 19%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 6%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 53%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 35%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 40%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 35%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 24%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 3
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 6%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 8%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 5%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 6%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 14.5%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 23%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 10%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 15.5%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 27%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 4%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 13%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 23%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 15%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 5%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 4%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 40%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 20%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 5%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 25%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 3%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 7%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 11%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 5%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 17%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 15%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 7%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 13%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 38%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 29%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 33%
1999-2000 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 15%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 20%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 45%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 42%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 21%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 10%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 10%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 7%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 6%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 29%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 13%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 10%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top