Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John William Warner's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Animals and Wildlife

2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 50
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2005-2006 Goldwater Institute - Positions 60
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 60%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 40%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 40%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 40%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 40%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2004 Goldwater Institute - Positions 40
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 40%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 40%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 40%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 40%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 40%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 40%
2003 Goldwater Institute - Positions 40%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 10%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 40%
2002 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 75%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 75%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 75%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 75%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 75%
2001-2002 Goldwater Institute - Positions 75%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 75%
2000 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 25%
2000 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 40
1999-2000 Goldwater Institute - Positions 40%
1999 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 25%
1995-1996 Goldwater Institute - Positions 50%
1995 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50%
1993-1994 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 15%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top