or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

John William Warner

John William Warner's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: John William Warner

Liberal

2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 65%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 40%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 38.8%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 44.7%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 0%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 20%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 40%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 10%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 22%
2003 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 27%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 0%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 31%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 15%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 13%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 36%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 12%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 15%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 0%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top