Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John William Warner's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Employment and Affirmative Action

Employment and Affirmative Action

2008 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 38%
2007 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 40%
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 30%
2007 National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 30%
2005-2006 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 0%
2004 Workplace Fairness - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 46%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 20%
2003-2004 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 33%
2003-2004 National Association for the Self-Employed - Positions 100%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 40%
2003 United Auto Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 8%
2003 Workplace Fairness - Positions 0%
2002 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 22%
2001-2002 National Association for the Self-Employed - Positions 100%
2001 American Benefits Council - Positions 57%
1999-2000 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 0%
1996 Communications Workers of America - Positions on Workplace Rights 88%
1996 United Auto Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 6%
1995-1996 International Association of Fire Fighters - Positions on Workplace Rights 17%
1995-1996 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 40%
1995 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top