Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

John William Warner's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 33%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 35%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 59.8%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 29%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 18%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 58%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 29%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 83%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 46
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 58%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 22%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 61.2%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 50%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 29%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 44%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 55.3%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 27%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 88%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 56%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 60%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 77%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 80%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 87%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 71%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 78%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 73%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 79%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 69%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 80%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 71%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 58%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 65%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 49%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 47%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 79%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 75%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 70%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 74%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 89%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 66%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 79%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 91%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top