or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Orrin G. Hatch

Senator Orrin G. Hatch's Special Interest Group Ratings

Orrin G. Hatch
Full Name: Orrin G. Hatch
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Republican
First Elected: 11/02/1976
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2018

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 92%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 90%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 91%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 90%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 63%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 35%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 85%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 6%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 18%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 82%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 15%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 72%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 28%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 99%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 70%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 70%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 89%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 72%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 27%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 84%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 87%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 16%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 97%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 100%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 92%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 84%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 89%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 84%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 70%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 67%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 30%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 67%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 91%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 45%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 88%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 71%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 70%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 71%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 68%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74.8%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 81%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 69%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 63%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 96
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 68%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Right Wing Index Score 50%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 36%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 66%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 34%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 69%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 66.5%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 64%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 72%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 82%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 47%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 56%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 0
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 17%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 89%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 74%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 69%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 73%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 66%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 41%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 60%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 96%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 78%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 83%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 85%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 80%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 100%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 84%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 78%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 83%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 90%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Center for Reclaiming America - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 60%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 88%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 85%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 Liberty Lobby - Positions 0%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 84%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 92%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
1999 Liberty Lobby - Positions 50%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 70%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 82%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1997 Liberty Lobby - Positions 10%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 48%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 92%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
1995 Liberty Lobby - Positions 30%
1993 Liberty Lobby - Positions 70%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top