or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Kay Bailey Hutchison

Kay Bailey Hutchison's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Kay Bailey Hutchison

Liberal

2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Composite Score) 28%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Foreign) 16%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 25%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 15%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 27%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 28%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 20%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 24.8%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 33.7%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 33%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 15%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 32%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 10%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 22%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 33%
2003 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 35%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 15%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 15%
2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 15%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 9%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 27%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 0%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 0%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top