or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Arlen Specter

Arlen Specter's Special Interest Group Ratings

Arlen Specter
Full Name: Arlen Specter

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 42%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 30%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 69%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 65%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 75%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 25%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 12%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 29%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 19%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 11%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 13%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 44%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 35%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 50%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 57%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 57%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 58%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 43%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 17%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 45%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 42%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 28%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 57%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 55.2%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 47%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 39%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 53
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 30%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Right Wing Index Score 50%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 28%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 40%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 58%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 23%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 16%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 54.5%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 51%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 54%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 49%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 54%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 13%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 40%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 33
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 43%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 47.5%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 49%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 43%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 40%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 28%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 60%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 61%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 63%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 48%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 79%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 53%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 66%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 77%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 83%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 56%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 48%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 76%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 67%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 82%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 65%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86%
2003 Center for Reclaiming America - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 83%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 89%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 53%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 50%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 49%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 50%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 42%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 15%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 40%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 58%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 62%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 71%
2000 Liberty Lobby - Positions 0%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 55%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 48%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 31%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 48%
1999 Liberty Lobby - Positions 20%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 35%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 33%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 53%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 40%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 20%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 32%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 43%
1997 Liberty Lobby - Positions 30%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 50%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 71%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 38%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 46%
1995 Liberty Lobby - Positions 20%
1993 Liberty Lobby - Positions 50%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top