Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Byron L. Dorgan's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: National Security

National Security

2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Center for Security Policy - Positions 25%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2007-2008 Center for Security Policy - Positions 18%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 70%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 72%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Center for Security Policy - Positions 32%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 91%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 18%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 75%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 75%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 43%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 20%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 90%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 0%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 29%
1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 82%
1993-1994 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top