Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kent Conrad's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Defense

Defense

2011-2012 Center for Security Policy - Positions 25%
2009-2012 Council for a Livable World - Positions (Senate) 92%
2009-2010 Center for Security Policy - Positions 16%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2008 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 67%
2007-2008 Center for Security Policy - Positions 35%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 70%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 72%
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 75%
2005-2006 Center for Security Policy - Positions 36%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 88%
2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 66%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 84%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 43%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 66%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 50%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 57%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 29%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 30%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 15%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 79%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 90%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 0%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 21%
1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 91%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 28%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top