or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Kent Conrad

Kent Conrad's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Full Name: Kent Conrad

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 86%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil Rights 100%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Total Score 100%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 75%
2011-2012 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 70%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 63%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 61%
2011 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) 100%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2010 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 67%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 73%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 64%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 45%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 97%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2009 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 91%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 17%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 95%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 78
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 64%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 60%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 78
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 90%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 94%
2007-2008 The Arc - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 86
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 80
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 69%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 66%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 87%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 67%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 67%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur F
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 67%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 56%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 75%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 70%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 57%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 73%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 75%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 75%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 86%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 44%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 38%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 89%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 83%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 94%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 83%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 93%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 40%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 43%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 79%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 75%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 88%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 77%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 25%
2001 Common Cause - Positions 100%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 40%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 82%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 91%
2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 43%
2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 100%
2000 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 43%
1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 94%
1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 33%
1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 33%
1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
1998 National Organization for Women - Positions 55%
1997-1998 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 0%
1997-1998 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 40%
1997-1998 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 95%
1997-1998 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 91%
1997 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 33%
1996 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 35%
1995-1996 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 56%
1995-1996 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 85%
1995-1996 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 70%
1991-1992 National Gay & Lesbian Task Force - Positions 20%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top