Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Frank R. Lautenberg's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Agriculture and Food

Agriculture and Food

2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2011 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
2009-2010 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
2009-2010 National Farmers Union - Positions 100%
2008 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 75%
2007-2008 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 58%
2007-2008 Grassroots Netroots Alliance - Positions 80%
2007-2008 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 75
2007 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 76%
2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 17%
2006 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 66%
2005-2006 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 17%
2005-2006 National Farmers Union - Positions 83%
2005 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 25%
2005 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Farmers Union - Positions 44%
2002 Vote Hemp - Positions on Industrial Hemp Policy Fence Sitter
1998 National Farmers Union - Positions 90%
1997 National Farmers Union - Positions 71%
1996 National Farmers Union - Positions 60%
1995-1996 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 16%
1995 National Farmers Union - Positions 70%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions on Agriculture 50%
1994 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 78%
1993-1994 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 22%
1993 National Farmers Union - Positions 78%
1991-1992 National Farmers Organization - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top