or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Judd A. Gregg

Judd A. Gregg's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Marriage, Family, and Children

Full Name: Judd A. Gregg

Marriage, Family, and Children

2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 73%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 89%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 66%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 70%
2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 0%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 83%
2007-2008 American Family Association - Positions 66%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 82
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 77%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 0%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 64%
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 71
2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 0%
2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 50%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 62%
2006 Population Connection - Positions 13%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2005 Population Connection - Positions 17%
2004 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2003-2004 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 0%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 Population Connection - Positions 0%
2002 American Family Voices - Positions 11%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 82%
2002 Population Connection - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 10%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2001 Population Connection - Positions 25%
2000 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2000 Population Connection - Positions 33%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 91%
1999-2000 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 80%
1999 Population Connection - Positions 33%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 91%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Population Connection - Positions 17%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 85%
1997 Population Connection - Positions 25%
1996 Population Connection - Positions 11%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top